Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 10/30/2012
Barnard v. State
Citations
- 290 P.3d 759
- 2012 OK CR 15
- 2012 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
- 2012 WL 5356320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because Section 11 complements the double jeopardy protections of the Oklahoma and United States Constitutions, a traditional double jeopardy analysis is conducted only if Section 11 does not apply
- “[E]ven though we review for plain error, rather than [preserved] error, the harmless error doctrine of the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S. Ct. 824, 17 L. Ed. 2d 705 (1967
- legislative intent is key to double-punishment analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Lewis, Lumpkin, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- SANDERS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2015-10-01· cited 68×
- Grant v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2013-08-15· cited 51×
- BOSSE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-05-25· cited 50×
- MITCHELL v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-10-07· cited 47×
- BAIRD v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-06-01· cited 37×
- BOSSE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2015-10-16· cited 27×
- DANIELS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-02-10· cited 22×
- CHADWELL v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-07-18· cited 18×
- TUCKER v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-12-21· cited 16×
- WHITE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-02-14· cited 13×
- KNAPPER v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-08-20· cited 12×
- Fahie v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2013-08-14· cited 9×
- SONNIER v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2014-09-17· cited 8×
- COCHLIN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-12-03· cited 8×
- ROUSCH v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-03-29· cited 7×
- BRINK v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2021-02-11· cited 7×
- Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-09-11· cited 7×
- THOMPSON v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-02-15· cited 6×
- FRANCIS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-09-10· cited 6×
- WASHBURNE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2024-04-11· cited 4×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-06-08· cited 378×
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-05-15· cited 263×
- Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-09-26· cited 112×
- Cuesta-Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-10-12· cited 101×
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-03-12· cited 99×
- Gilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-07-26· cited 96×
- Short v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-04-14· cited 85×
- Postelle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-12-29· cited 74×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-08-15· cited 71×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-12-14· cited 51×
- Head v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-10-24· cited 51×
- United States v. BohuchotFifth Circuit· 2010-11-09· cited 41×
- Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-08-31· cited 38×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-03-16· cited 27×
- McInturff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-09-17· cited 11×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-11-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.