Skip to main content

Wood v. State

Citations

  • 299 S.W.3d 200
  • 2009 WL 3230848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under Melendez-Diaz, autopsy report involving death that was suspected homicide was testimonial statement and that medical examiner who wrote report was witness within meaning of Confrontation Clause
  • holding that, while not all autopsy reports are testimonial, the subject autopsy report was testimonial where the circumstances were suspicious and police suspected homicide
  • holding that an autopsy report was testimonial when it was reasonable to assume that the pathologist “understood that the report containing her findings and opinions would be used prosecutorially”
  • holding that an autopsy report was testimonial when it was reasonable to assume thatthe pathologist “understood that the report containing her findings and opinions would be used prosecutorially”
  • holding the autopsy report was testimonial where police suspected the death was a homicide
  • holding the autopsy report was testimonial where police suspected the death was a homicide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Pemberton, Waldrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.