Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/16/2008
Fischer v. State
Citations
- 252 S.W.3d 375
- 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5
- 2008 WL 141850
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that rule 803(1) was not applicable when the officer did not merely explain or describe events but participated in and created the events in his recorded observations
- holding that rule 803(1) was not applicable when the officer did not merely explain or describe events but participated in and created the events in his recorded observations
- holding that rule 803(1) was not applicable when the officer did not merely explain or describe events but participated in and created the events in his recorded observations
- recognizing that “res gestae,” literally translated as “things done,” is “an imprecise Latin legalese term” which has been used to describe several different types of “unreflective statements” which are hearsay exceptions under the rules of evidence
- stating that 803(1) is “predicated on the notion that the utterance is a reflex product of immediate sensual impressions, unaided by retrospective mental processes”
- stating that 803(1) is “predicated on the notion that the utterance is a reflex product of immediate sensual impressions, unaided by retrospective mental processes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cochran, Price, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Keasler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-10-01· cited 101×
- Reyes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-03-17· cited 47×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-29· cited 45×
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. CaruanaTexas Supreme Court· 2012-03-30· cited 34×
- Russell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-05-13· cited 29×
- Resendez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-05-29· cited 23×
- Dixon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-12-14· cited 22×
- Wilkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-04-27· cited 16×
- Martin Suarez Juarez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-03-24· cited 15×
- Peter H. Eggert v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2012-11-07· cited 15×
- Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-10-01· cited 13×
- Eloy Jiovanni Perez Alcala v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-11-14· cited 12×
- Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-30· cited 12×
- Phillips v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2012-03-08· cited 4×
- State of Arizona v. Arthur Cornell WrightCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-03-23· cited 3×
- Jeremias Fuentes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-12-03
- Ross Layton Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-10-01
- William Cash Love v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2000-05-10
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-03-26
- Davey Enriquez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-07-07
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18· cited 566×
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 388×
- Pondexter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-16· cited 349×
- Rabbani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 293×
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-21· cited 200×
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kevin Manfre, Appellant/cross-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 2004-06-21· cited 168×
- United States v. Oscar Ramos QuezadaFifth Circuit· 1985-02-20· cited 116×
- United States v. Ralph Pena-GutierrezNinth Circuit· 2000-08-11· cited 99×
- United States v. Hoyle Lamont Peacock, Vera Lee Peacock and Harvey Coleman PeacockFifth Circuit· 1981-08-27· cited 91×
- United States v. Byron MitchellThird Circuit· 1998-05-14· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 88×
- Mark Cody v. Taft Harris and Dontron, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2005-05-31· cited 85×
- United States v. Charles WoodsSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-20· cited 62×
- United States v. Francisco Hernandez-RojasNinth Circuit· 1980-04-25· cited 58×
- United States v. Refugio RuizSeventh Circuit· 2001-05-02· cited 52×
- State v. BlubaughCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-09-28· cited 48×
- Brooks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-04-28· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.