Reynolds v. Chrysler First Commercial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he gist of the [strict liability] action is the keeping [of] the animal after knowledge of its mischievous propensities”
• noting that “[t]he gist of the [strict liability] action is the keeping [of] the animal after knowledge of its mischievous propensities”
• stating that “[t]he owner or keeper of the dog or other domestic animal must be shown to have had knowledge of its disposition to commit such injury
• stating that “[t]he owner or keeper of the dog 16 or other domestic animal must be shown to have had knowledge of its disposition to commit such injury
• requiring only that the owner or keeper of a vicious animal have “knowledge of [a vicious animal’s] disposition to commit such injuries]” and not that the owner “has seen the animal attack mankind”
• requiring only that the owner or keeper of a vicious animal have \knowledge of [a vicious animal's] disposition to commit such injuries\ and not that the owner \has seen the animal attack mankind\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).