Supreme Court of New Jersey· 5/18/1994

VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.

Citations

641 A.2d 519
135 N.J. 539
1994 N.J. LEXIS 428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that contracts should be examined as a whole when determining the intent of the parties
holding that the unjust enrich ment doctrine requires that the Plaintiff show it expected renumeration from the defendant at the time it performed or conferred a benefit on the defendant and that the failure of remuneration enriched defendant beyond its contractual rights
looking to, inter alia, custom and usage as evidence of the parties’ intention
looking to, inter alia, custom and usage as evidence of the parties’ intention
“To establish unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must show both that defendant received a benefit and that retention of that benefit without payment would be unjust.”
“To establish unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must show both that defendant received a benefit and that retention of that benefit without payment would be unjust.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Handler, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-27· cited 5×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.