VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contracts should be examined as a whole when determining the intent of the parties
• holding that the unjust enrich ment doctrine requires that the Plaintiff show it expected renumeration from the defendant at the time it performed or conferred a benefit on the defendant and that the failure of remuneration enriched defendant beyond its contractual rights
• looking to, inter alia, custom and usage as evidence of the parties’ intention
• looking to, inter alia, custom and usage as evidence of the parties’ intention
• “To establish unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must show both that defendant received a benefit and that retention of that benefit without payment would be unjust.”
• “To establish unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must show both that defendant received a benefit and that retention of that benefit without payment would be unjust.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-27· cited 5×