New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/22/2009
Goldsmith v. Camden County
Citations
- 975 A.2d 459
- 408 N.J. Super. 376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that breach of contract and unjust enrichment are mutually exclusive theories of recovery
- observing that “unjust enrichment is not an independent theory of liability but is the basis for a claim of quasi-contractual liability”
- \raising an issue for the first time in a reply brief is improper\
- “Unjust enrichment is not an independent theory of liability but is the basis for a claim of quasi- contractual liability.”
- “Unjust enrichment is not an independent theory of liability, but is the basis for a claim of quasi-contractual liability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Axelrad
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Gen. Motors LLCS.D. Illinois· 2018-09-12· cited 16×
- Hassler v. Sovereign BankThird Circuit· 2010-03-15· cited 16×
- Edminster, Hinshaw, Russ v. Downe TownshipFifth Circuit· 2020-03-19· cited 9×
- Smith v. Hudson County RegisterNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-02-10· cited 6×
- Marina District Development Co. v. IveyD. New Jersey· 2015-03-13· cited 5×
- L & W Supply Corp. v. DeSilvaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-12-19· cited 4×
- State v. HanniganNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-07-22· cited 3×
- Nebraskaland, Inc. v. River Street Idealease, LLCD. New Jersey· 2016-05-18· cited 3×
- LiVecchia v. MOUNT ARLINGTONNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-07-13· cited 1×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-01-02· cited 1,068×
- VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-05-18· cited 276×
- Reynolds Offset Co., Inc. v. SummerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-12-22· cited 182×
- Mason v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-07-22· cited 176×
- Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-06-24· cited 141×
- Callano v. Oakwood Park Homes Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1966-04-26· cited 105×
- County of Essex v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2006-01-26· cited 83×
- Borough of Berlin v. Remington & Vernick EngineersNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-03-12· cited 70×
- Higg-A-Rella, Inc. v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-19· cited 57×
- Kopin v. Orange Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-02-10· cited 51×
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. WalliaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-06-20· cited 45×
- Caputo v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-04-22· cited 38×
- Caputo v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTSSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-09-08· cited 36×
- National Amusements v. Turnpike Auth.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-26· cited 35×
- Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of MercerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-12-18· cited 27×
- New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. New Jersey Council on Affordable HousingNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-01-24· cited 23×
- County of Essex v. First Union BankNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-12-22· cited 18×
- McClam v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-11-14· cited 13×
- Dugan v. Camden Cty. Clerk's OfficeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-22· cited 10×
- Libertarian Party v. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-03-23· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.