Goldsmith v. Camden County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that breach of contract and unjust enrichment are mutually exclusive theories of recovery
• observing that “unjust enrichment is not an independent theory of liability but is the basis for a claim of quasi-contractual liability”
• \raising an issue for the first time in a reply brief is improper\
• “Unjust enrichment is not an independent theory of liability but is the basis for a claim of quasi- contractual liability.”
• “Unjust enrichment is not an independent theory of liability, but is the basis for a claim of quasi-contractual liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).