SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. Zudkewich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that savings clause ran from time a reasonable commercial creditor would have done an asset search and not from when deed was recorded
• observing that “retroactive application would likely preclude creditors from recovery in a substantial number of cases, greatly prejudicing ... the entire commercial lending industry”
• applying discovery rule to fraudulent transfer claim under version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers 12 A-4636-13T4 Act then in effect
• considering the financial impact of a new rule on “the entire commercial lending industry” when the new rule invalidated “a practice apparently dominant throughout the industry”
• stating the clear language of N.J.S.A. 25:2-31 reveals \the Legislature concluded that the date of judgment was not determinative of the timeliness of claims under the [Act]\
• later superseded by statute when New Jersey deleted the “could 27 reasonably discover” language from its statute, see N.J. Stat. Ann. § 25:2-31(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).