Maniscalco v. Brother International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that conclusory statement about the replacement cost of a defective machine was an adequate allegation of ascertainable loss
• noting that an “[a]n unjust enrichment claim may be sustained independently as an alternative theory of recovery”
• finding that conclusory statement about the replacement cost of a defective machine was an adequate allegation of ascertainable loss
• stating that under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, “the loss must be ascertainable” but “no special specificity with regard to pleading ascertainable loss is required,” yet finding that quantification was in fact provided
• finding “[a]n unjust enrichment claim may be sustained independently as an alternative theory of recovery”
• finding “[a]n unjust enrichment claim may be sustained independently as an alternative theory of recovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).