Bytemark, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing unjust enrichment claim where “based on the same factual allegations underlying” the plaintiff's contract and tort claims
• denying a motion to dismiss a 11 New York common law unfair competition claim because the plaintiff alleged that the 12 defendants pretended to form a partnership with the plaintiff to obtain confidential information
• dismissing an unfair competition claim because the plaintiff did “not [plead] facts demonstrating that [the relevant defendant] knew that the technology it purchased . . . and helped sell . . . was [the] [p]laintiff’s technology”
• Defendant used partnership to take information about plaintiff’s proprietary technology and cut plaintiff out of future business
• “Because (1) Plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim under New York law is based on the same factual allegations underlying its contract and tort claims; and (2
• “New York's unfair competition law is a broad and flexible doctrine that depends more upon the facts set forth ... than in most causes of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Foman v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
• Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
• DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.
  Second Circuit· 2010-10-07· cited 1,722×
• Ruotolo v. City of New York
  Second Circuit· 2008-02-06· cited 1,344×
• Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2007-07-24· cited 991×
• Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 2002-11-04· cited 951×
• Sebastian Mangiafico v. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General, John Armstrong, and Theresa Lantz, Docket No. 05-5465-Cv
  Second Circuit· 2006-12-19· cited 747×
• Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.
  Supreme Court· 1964-04-06· cited 664×
• William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees
  Second Circuit· 1999-06-09· cited 630×
• Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Management LLC
  Second Circuit· 2012-08-06· cited 628×
• Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 2012-03-29· cited 580×
• Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2007-10-23· cited 329×
• VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-05-18· cited 276×
• Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-05-12· cited 270×
• Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-05-05· cited 262×
• Jeffrey Milstein, Inc., D/B/A Paper House Productions v. Greger, Lawlor, Roth, Inc., D/B/A Triangle Enterprises
  Second Circuit· 1995-06-19· cited 238×
• Mordechai Gurary v. Isaac Winehouse and Isaac Winehouse, Doing Business as Wall & Broad Equities, Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2000-12-19· cited 175×
• Carvel Corp. v. Noonan
  Second Circuit· 2003-11-21· cited 171×
• Rodime Plc v. Seagate Technology, Inc., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-06-03· cited 159×