· 3/27/2012
Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.
Citations
- 849 F. Supp. 2d 439
- 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 265
- 2012 WL 1005329
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Thus, even if we assume for the moment that a non- party, such as ICSP, has no right, as a stranger to the action, to submit a motion pursuant to Rule 19, the court is permitted to consider the implications of Rule 19 on an action sua sponte.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolfson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.