Skip to main content
· 3/27/2012

Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.

Citations

  • 849 F. Supp. 2d 439
  • 77 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 265
  • 2012 WL 1005329
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus, even if we assume for the moment that a non- party, such as ICSP, has no right, as a stranger to the action, to submit a motion pursuant to Rule 19, the court is permitted to consider the implications of Rule 19 on an action sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.