Vineberg v. Bissonnette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a party's proffer of relevant leads it might obtain through additional discovery \may be an important factor in deciding whether to reopen discovery\
• recognizing that a party's proffer of relevant leads it might obtain through additional discovery \may be an important factor in deciding whether to reopen discovery\
• noting that “prejudice in this context is normally either evidence-based or expectations-based”
• affirming district court's denial of request to reopen discoveryfiled five weeks after opponent's motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).