Wilson v. Moulison North Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “neither prisoners nor ‘persons 11 convicted of crimes’ constitute a suspect class for equal protection purposes”
• stating that requiring entries which permit effective review of the fees is in accord with cases from the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court
• noting that to prevail against an employer, the plaintiff “must show that the employer is liable either for creating or for tolerating th[e hostile] atmosphere”
• stating that the non-moving party is entitled to have the summary judgment facts considered in the light most favorable to his cause
• testifying that decision to issue letter of warning to Weinroth was based solely on Moquin’s own investigation, and no input from Dieckman
• stating that verbal warnings have “regularly been recognized as an appropriate starting point” in assessing employer liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).