Bose Corporation v. Ejaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T] he common law trademark claims in Massachusetts…require the same elements as the federal claim.”
• rule that contract is binding only in absence of fraud was affirmative defense required to be pleaded with particularity under Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)
• “[A] hypothetical larger range, separated from the actual facts and the amount sought, does not make a clause unreasonable. Rather, courts examine for reasonableness the amount of liquidated damages actually sought.”
• \Fraud is an affirmative defense that must be pleaded with particularity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).