Saul Martinez v. Janet Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that § 1252(a)(5) provides the “sole and exclusive” means of judicial review of an order of removal and prohibits APA claims
• affirming district court’s lack of jurisdiction to review claim indirectly challenging removal order by alleging capricious agency action in violation of Administrative Procedure Act
• finding barred plaintiff’s challenges to “the procedure and substance of the BIA’s determination that he was ineligible for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the [Convention Against Torture]”
• “The exclusive 8 means to challenge an order of removal is the petition for review process.”
• the provisions \limit all aliens to one bite of the apple with regard to challenging an order of removal.\
• the “statutory scheme was designed to limit all [noncitizens] to one bite of the apple with regard to challenging an order of removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).