Skip to main content

Thorpe v. State

Citations

  • 678 S.E.2d 913
  • 285 Ga. 604
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2212
  • 2009 Ga. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[wjhether or not a prospective juror is qualified must be determined based on a consideration of the voir dire as a whole”
  • admission of defendant’s “unguarded response to a perceived confidante,” not barred where, unbeknownst to defendant, confidante was actually a state agent
  • trial court acted within its discretion in allowing lead detective to remain in courtroom, given the large number of exhibits and witnesses
  • trial court acted within its discretion in allowing lead detective to remain in courtroom, given the large number of exhibits and witnesses
  • Co-conspirator “hearsay statements are admissible when the State at some point before the close of evidence establishes a prima facie case of conspiracy independent of the co-conspirator statement”
  • “There is likewise no indication that the jury confused the evidence or law; all three defendants were charged with identical crimes, and the jury, in reaching different verdicts as to each co-defendant, proved itself amply capable of distinguishing the evidence relevant to each.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.