Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 298 Ga. 259
  • 779 S.E.2d 342
  • 2015 Ga. LEXIS 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • equating the third, harm prong of the plain error standard with the prejudice required to establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
  • equating the third, harm prong of the plain error standard with the prejudice required to establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
  • equating the harm prongs of the standards for showing plain error and ineffective assistance of counsel
  • equating the third, harm prong of the plain error standard with the \test in ineffective assistance of counsel cases for whether an attorney's deficient performance has resulted in prejudice of constitutional proportions\
  • equating the third, harm prong of the plain error standard with the “test in ineffective assistance of counsel cases for whether an attorney’s deficient performance has resulted in prejudice of constitutional proportions”
  • noting that this Court’s obligation under OCGA § 17-10-35 (c) (1) to conduct a plenary review in all death penalty cases “guards against any obvious impropriety at trial, whether objected to or not, that in reasonable probability led to the jury’s decision to impose a death sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines, Hunstein, Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

92 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.