Skip to main content

Rowland v. State

Citations

  • 829 S.E.2d 81
  • 306 Ga. 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a verdict form should be considered in conjunction with the jury charges
  • holding that a verdict form should be considered in conjunction with the jury charges
  • holding that a verdict form should be considered in conjunction with the jury charges
  • noting a defendant’s flight is “generally admissible as circumstantial evidence of guilt”
  • “Evidence showing that a defendant attempted to evade arrest . . . may be admissible as evidence of flight, and statements about flight are generally admissible as circumstantial evidence of guilt.”
  • “A preprinted verdict form is treated as part of the jury instructions which are read and considered as a whole in determining whether there is [instructional] error.” (citations and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.