Veney v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for clear error because “[a]llowing a litigant to obtain de novo review of her entire case by merely reformatting an earlier brief as an objection ‘mak([es] the initial reference to the magistrate useless’”) (quoting Howard, 932 F.2d at 509

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).