Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimant’s allegations of pain need not be accepted to extent that they conflict with the record
• holding that claimant’s allegations of pain need not be accepted to extent that they conflict with the record
• holding that, “if a physician’s opinion is not supported by clinical evidence . . ., it should be accorded significantly less weight”
• holding that claimant’s allegations of pain need not be accepted to extent that they conflict with the record
• holding that “if a physician’s opinion is not supported by clinical evidence or if it is inconsistent with other substantial evidence, it should be accorded significantly less weight”
• recognizing that, if treating source’s opinion “is not supported by clinical evidence or it is inconsistent with other substantial evidence, it should be accorded significantly less weight” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).