Charles E. Lockert v. Gordon H. Faulkner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts “should not have to guess what arguments an objecting party depends on when reviewing a magistrate’s report”
• holding general objections do not 1 | guess what arguments an objecting party depends on when reviewing a magistrate judge’s 2 | report”
• holding the rationale of Thomas requires waiver to apply to each issue not included in an objection
• explaining that “an objection stating only ‘I object’ preserves no issue” for a district court or a subsequent appeal
• holding general objections do not preserve arguments for appellate review 8 and stating that “[a] district judge should not have to guess what arguments an objecting party 9 depends on when reviewing a magistrate judge’s report”
• holding general objections do not preserve 11 arguments for appellate review and stating that “[a] district judge should not have to guess what 12 arguments an objecting party depends on when reviewing a magistrate judge’s report”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).