Skip to main content

Vega v. State

Citations

  • 236 P.3d 632
  • 126 Nev. 332
  • 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 33
  • 2010 Nev. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert's independent opinion did not violate the Confrontation Clause even though the reports it was based upon would
  • holding that testimony relating to the content of such reports may violate the confrontation clause, but testimony 14 regarding the testifier’s independent opinions does not
  • holding that admission of an expert's independent opinion based on evidence she reviewed does not violate the Confrontation Clause
  • holding that expert's independent opinion did not violate the Confrontation Clause even though the reports it was based upon did
  • holding that admission of an expert's independent opinion based on evidence she reviewed does not violate the Confrontation Clause
  • holding that \Mlle threshold question in evaluating a confrontation right .. . is whether the statement was testimonial in nature\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Douglas, Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.