Nevada Supreme Court· 5/30/1996

Domingues v. State

Citations

917 P.2d 1364
112 Nev. 683
1996 Nev. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the admission of irrelevant evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence supporting the conviction
holding that the district court erred in prohibiting counsel from presenting additional statements that helped to contextualize the time frame of admitted statements
concluding that incarceration due to criminal conduct is voluntary thereby not justifying a modification of a child support order
stating that this court will not disturb the district court's decision to deny a motion for a new trial absent an abuse of discretion
stating that this court will not disturb the district court's decision to deny a motion for a new trial absent an abuse of discretion
stating that this court will not disturb the district court's decision to deny a motion for a new trial absent an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shearing, Steffen, Young, Springer, Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Domingues v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.