Skip to main content
· 1/27/2011

Dieudonne v. State

Citations

  • 245 P.3d 1202
  • 127 Nev. 1
  • 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 1
  • 2011 Nev. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that erroneous admission of victim-impact 2 statements is reviewed for harmless error
  • providing that issues not raised on appeal by the appellant are deemed waived
  • reviewing the failure to object to victim impact statements for 18 plain error
  • reviewing the failure to object to victim impact statements for plain error
  • “Dieudonne’s failure to object [to the assignment of a new sentencing judge] further supports the conclusion that the plea was, in fact, not entered into in reliance on the sentencing judge being the same judge who accepted the plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Saitta, Gibbons, Pickering, Hardesty, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.