Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/9/2010
Vasquez v. State
Citations
- 698 S.E.2d 561
- 388 S.C. 447
- 2010 S.C. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing circumstances in which arguments meant to arouse religious animosity are prohibited
- \The State's closing arguments must be confined to evidence in the record and the reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-10-10· cited 12×
- State v. Jaron GibbsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-01-04
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-07-05
- State v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-10-05
- Washington v. State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-01-15
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-05-14· cited 114×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-27· cited 103×
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-08-31· cited 93×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 68×
- United States v. Khalil Abdul Hakim A/K/A Anthony Lowery Khalil Abdul HakimThird Circuit· 2003-09-22· cited 56×
- Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-22· cited 53×
- Toyota of Florence, Inc. v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-04-04· cited 43×
- Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 40×
- State v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 38×
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-01· cited 36×
- State v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-07· cited 30×
- Von Dohlen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-30· cited 29×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-10-13· cited 29×
- Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-28· cited 28×
- State v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 25×
- Rosemond v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-29· cited 25×
- State v. VazquezSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-25· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.