Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/22/2007

Suber v. State

Citations

640 S.E.2d 884
371 S.C. 554
2007 S.C. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that this Court will uphold the findings of the PCR judge when there is any evidence of probative value to support them, and will reverse the decision of the PCR judge when it is controlled by an error of law
reversing the PCR court's decision because there was no evidence of probative value to support it
finding evidence was “insufficient” to support claim that defendant was guilty only of lesser included offense because evidence suggested only that defendant may have been not guilty of the greater offense
noting the court will uphold the findings of the PCR court when there is any evidence of probative value to support them and will reverse when the decision is controlled by an error of law
this Court will uphold findings of the PCR judge when there is any evidence of probative value to support them
\[T]he trial court should refuse to charge on a lesser included offense where there is no evidence that the defendant committed the lesser rather than the greater offense.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Suber v. State

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.