Skip to main content

State v. Daniels

Citations

  • 401 S.C. 251
  • 737 S.E.2d 473
  • 2012 S.C. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • instructing discontinuance of charge that jury's duty is to return a verdict that is just and fair to all parties
  • instructing discontinuance of charge that jury's duty is to return a verdict just and fair to all parties
  • instructing discontinuance of charge that jury's duty is to return a verdict that is just and fair to all parties
  • instructing a trial judge to remove language from his charge that told the jury to reach a verdict that would represent truth and justice for all parties because such language could alter the jury's perception of the burden of proof
  • \It is axiomatic that a party cannot raise an objection to a jury charge for the first time on appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Hearn, III, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.