Rosemond v. Catoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding PCR applicant not prejudiced by trial counsel's performance because evidence of guilt was overwhelming
• holding PCR applicant not prejudiced by trial counsel’s performance because evidence of guilt was overwhelming
• holding appellate court need not reach remaining issues when addressed issues are dispositive
• involving a double murder committed in the course of a burglary
• involving a double murder committed in the course of a burglary
• rejecting the State’s argument that the petitioner merely sought a “fancier” mitigation case where no evidence of capital defendant’s known mental health issues was presented at trial (quoting Jones v. State, 332 S.C. 329, 339, 504 S.E.2d 822, 827 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).