Skip to main content

Valdes v. State

Citations

  • 765 So. 2d 774
  • 2000 WL 889837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a \defendant is entitled to relief under rule 3.800(a) [if] his Hale claim is apparent from the face of the record.\
  • holding that a Hale claim is cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion so long as it is apparent on the face of the record
  • concluding that the appellant was entitled to relief because his Hale claim was apparent from the face of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.