Teague v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Hale claim is cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion as long as the fact that multiple convictions arose from a single criminal episode is readily apparent from the face of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-25· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• Valdes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-06· cited 30×