Pullins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court's denial of Hale claim where 3.800(a) motion failed to point to record facts demonstrating crimes were committed in a single episode
• \ Hale claims are cognizable in 3.800(a) motions if the claim can be established on the face of the record.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-31· cited 13×
• Theophile v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-21· cited 11×
• Elliott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-03· cited 5×
• Johnson v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-12· cited 3×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-09· cited 1×
• Phipps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-18· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• Baker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-27· cited 76×
• Valdes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-06· cited 30×
• Tillman v. Singletary
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 1×