Skip to main content

Adams v. State

Citations

  • 755 So. 2d 678
  • 1999 WL 445698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that movant may assert a Hale [2] claim in a rule 3.800(a) motion if the facts supporting the claim are apparent from the face of the record
  • finding that a Hale claim which alleges that it may be determined without resort to extra-record facts is cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion
  • suggesting that supreme court in Callaway did not \irretrievably foreclose\ such relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.