State v. Mancino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “sentence that does not mandate credit for time served would be illegal since a trial court has no discretion to impose a sentence without crediting a defendant with time served”
• noting that “rule 3.800(a) motions should ‘be limited to those sentencing issues that can be resolved as a matter of law without an evidentiary determination’ ”
• stating that “a sentence that does not mandate credit for time served would be illegal since a trial court has no discretion to impose a sentence without crediting a defendant with time served”
• \A sentence that patently fails to comport with statutory or constitutional limitations is by definition `illegal.\
• denial of 3.800 motion for jail credit reversed where court failed to attach appropriate record
• “A sentence that patently fails to comport with statutory or constitutional limitations is by definition ‘illegal’.” (emphasis supplied)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).