Smith v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court should apply the version of section 775.084 \which was in effect at the time Appellant committed the crime for which he was habitualized\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-29· cited 8×
• Harper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-27· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-06· cited 4×
• Ruiz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-14· cited 1×
• Stanley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-10-04· cited 1,882×
• Carawan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 474×
• Valdes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-06· cited 30×
• Girtman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-21· cited 5×
• Dixon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-04· cited 3×
• Barber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-07· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-06· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-28· cited 1×