Tenth Circuit· 8/10/2004
United States v. Wooten
Citations
- 377 F.3d 1134
- 65 Fed. R. Serv. 138
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16449
- 2004 WL 1776012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the district court may restrict a defendant’s compulsory process right to present witnesses if the testimony is irrelevant
- “The court will not consider . . . issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation.”
- “The court will not consider . . . issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Briscoe, Lungstrum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.