Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/10/2004

United States v. Wooten

Citations

  • 377 F.3d 1134
  • 65 Fed. R. Serv. 138
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16449
  • 2004 WL 1776012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the district court may restrict a defendant’s compulsory process right to present witnesses if the testimony is irrelevant
  • “The court will not consider . . . issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation.”
  • “The court will not consider . . . issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Briscoe, Lungstrum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.