United States v. Milkiewicz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “summary chart [under Rule 611(a)] . . . must be linked to evidence previously admitted and usually is not itself ad- mitted into evidence”
• noting that “[t]he only arguably ‘expert’ evidence” in summary charts of financial transactions was the calculation of tax liabilities, since “creating summaries of [routine financial records] took patience but not expertise”
• “A summary chart used as a pedagogical device must be linked to evidence previously admitted .... ”
• “A summary chart used as a pedagogical device must be linked to evidence previously admitted____”
• “The proponent must show that the voluminous source materials are what the proponent claims them to be and that the summary accurately summarizes the source materials.”
• “A summary chart used as a pedagogical device must be linked to evidence previously admitted . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).