Bernhard Dohrmann v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We generally will not consider a habeas claim raised for the first time on appeal.”
• implicitly recognizing restitution as punishment in holding that, because the MVRA does not have a prescribed statutory maximum, restitution orders do not violate the rule set out in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000
• “We agree with the holdings of our sister circuits and adopt USCA11 Case: 19-11044 Date Filed: 02/01/2022 Page: 30 of 31 30 Opinion of the Court 19-11044 their reasoning in holding that Apprendi[6] does not apply to a res- titution order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).