· 8/12/2005
United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219)
Citations
- 419 F.3d 451
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16855
- 2005 WL 1941286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e now conclude that Booker does not apply to [orders of] restitution.”
- “[W]e now conclude that Booker does not apply to [orders of] restitution.”
- which we summarize, together with United States v. Marino, above
- “[T]he restitution statutes do not specify a statutory maximum.”
- “[T]he restitution statutes do not specify a statutory maximum.”
- “[T]he restitution statutes do not specify a statutory maximum.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder, Daughtrey, O'Kelley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.