Skip to main content
· 8/12/2005

United States v. Rachel Shannon Sosebee (03-1923) and Jack P. Farris (03-2219)

Citations

  • 419 F.3d 451
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16855
  • 2005 WL 1941286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e now conclude that Booker does not apply to [orders of] restitution.”
  • “[W]e now conclude that Booker does not apply to [orders of] restitution.”
  • which we summarize, together with United States v. Marino, above
  • “[T]he restitution statutes do not specify a statutory maximum.”
  • “[T]he restitution statutes do not specify a statutory maximum.”
  • “[T]he restitution statutes do not specify a statutory maximum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batchelder, Daughtrey, O'Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.