Larry MURRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that perfunctory complaints that fail to frame and develop an issue are insufficient to invoke appellate review
• concluding that “perfunctory complaints” that “fail to frame and develop an issue” are not “sufficient to invoke appellate review”
• recognizing that challenge to only one of two bases for determination is inherently inadequate
• noting that “perfunctory complaints” failing “to frame and develop an issue” are not “sufficient to invoke appellate review”
• noting that “perfunctory complaints” failing “to frame and develop an issue” are not “sufficient to invoke appellate review”
• noting that “perfunctory complaints fail to frame and develop an issue sufficient to invoke [judicial] review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).