Tenth Circuit· 10/21/1996

United States v. Webb

Citations

98 F.3d 585
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27430
1996 WL 599789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that because we specifically directed the district court to impose a sentence between 27-33 months, “the mandate rule prohibited the district court from departing downward from the guideline range enunciated”
concluding mandate rule applied to preclude reconsideration of Webb’s argument in part because, although the first opinion did not specifically address the argument, the panel had denied Webb’s petition for rehearing explicitly advancing the same argument
resentencing on remand is usually de novo unless appellate court specifically limited district court's discretion
appellate mandate specifically ordered district court to resentence defendant within guideline range of 27-33 months
“Although resentencing on remand is typically de novo, this does not hold true where an appellate court has specifically limited a district court’s discretion.”
appellate mandate specifically ordered district court to resentence defendant within guideline range of 27-33 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Logan, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.