· 9/13/1993
United States v. George Robert Bell
Citations
- 5 F.3d 64
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23382
- 1993 WL 345369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the mandate rule bars litigation of issues “foregone on appeal or otherwise waived”
- noting that the mandate “rule forecloses litigation of issues decided by the district court but foregone on appeal or otherwise waived”
- holding the mandate rule “forecloses litigation of issues decided by the district court but foregone on appeal or otherwise waived.”
- stating that the law of the case doctrine \compels compliance on remand with the dictates of a superior court and forecloses relitigation of issues expressly or impliedly decided by the appellate court\
- listing the three limited exceptions to the mandate rule
- describing the exceptions to the mandate rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.