Skip to main content
· 9/13/1993

United States v. George Robert Bell

Citations

  • 5 F.3d 64
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23382
  • 1993 WL 345369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the mandate rule bars litigation of issues “foregone on appeal or otherwise waived”
  • noting that the mandate “rule forecloses litigation of issues decided by the district court but foregone on appeal or otherwise waived”
  • holding the mandate rule “forecloses litigation of issues decided by the district court but foregone on appeal or otherwise waived.”
  • stating that the law of the case doctrine \compels compliance on remand with the dictates of a superior court and forecloses relitigation of issues expressly or impliedly decided by the appellate court\
  • listing the three limited exceptions to the mandate rule
  • describing the exceptions to the mandate rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.