Federal Deposit Insurance v. McFarland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \FDIC argues that we should consider extrinsic evidence admitted by the district court regarding the intentions of the parties. We disagree. The language of the mortgage unambiguously describes the property covered as ending at the Louisiana boundary. That alone decides the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).