Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 4/13/2009

United States v. Webb

Citations

  • 565 F.3d 789
  • 2009 WL 973214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “18 U.S.C. §3006A(c) does not provide a statutory right to counsel at a § 3582(c)(2) motion or hearing”
  • concluding that there is no constitutional or statutory right to counsel in an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding
  • recognizing that Rule 43(b)(4) permits a court to hold a § 3582(c)(2) hearing without the defendant being present due to the limited nature of a resentencing under § 3582(c)(2)
  • stating that the standard of review for denial of sentence reduction pursuant to § 3582(c)(2
  • applying the abuse of discretion standard to a court’s denial of a sentence reduction requested under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
  • explaining that a resentencing after a Sentencing Guidelines range is lowered is “ ‘a continuation of a criminal case’ rather than a ‘civil post-conviction action’ like a habeas petition” (quoting United States v. Fair, 326 F.3d 1317, 1318 (11th Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Marcus, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Webb

95 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.