Skip to main content
· 8/22/2001

Huffman v. Saul Holdings Ltd. Partnership

Citations

  • 262 F.3d 1128
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4266
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18956
  • 2001 WL 951380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts should \ensure that an award of attorneys' fees pursuant to § 1447(c) is reasonable\
  • recognizing certain well-established exceptions to the mandate rule, permitting the district court to depart from tire mandate rule if blatant error would result in serious injustice
  • recognizing certain well-established exceptions to the mandate rule, permitting the district court to depart from the mandate rule if blatant error would result in serious injustice
  • “To be compensable, their fees must be actually ‘incurred,’ that is, they must reflect efforts expended to resist removal.”
  • “To be compensable, their fees must be actually ‘incurred,’ that is, they must reflect efforts expended to resist removal.”
  • “To be compensable, [the plaintiff’s] fees must be actually ‘incurred,’ that is, they must reflect efforts expended to resist their removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McKay, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.