United States v. Lali Sorrentino Pimentel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the scope of remand was limited to a single sentencing issue and that the district court thus lacked authority to reexamine any other sentencing issues on remand
• “In light of this clear evidence that the scope of our remand was limited to the single sentencing issue raised in Pimentel’s prior appeal, the district court was without authority to reexamine any other sentencing issues on remand.”
• “In light of this clear 13 evidence that the scope of our remand was limited to the single sentencing issue raised 14 in Pimentel’s prior appeal, the district court was without authority to reexamine any other 15 sentencing issues on remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).