United States v. Warr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “although the district court should not have cited the study without first notifying the parties, its failure to do so does not amount to plain error”
• finding Rule 32 violation where district court relied on a Bureau of Prisons’ study when sentencing defendant without “notif[ying] [him] of it before the sentencing hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).