United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA Chino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that merely a “single incident of persons acting under a defendant’s direction is sufficient to support a two-level role enhancement”
• deciding that notwithstanding its obligations under a plea agreement, the government has “a duty to ensure that the court has complete and accurate information, enabling the court to impose an appropriate sentence”
• stating that a defendant needs to exercise authority over only one other participant to merit the adjustment and a single incident of a person acting under defendant’s direction is sufficient
• stating that a defendant needs to exercise authority over only one other participant to merit the adjustment and a single incident of a person acting under direction is sufficient to support the sentence enhancement
• pointing out discrepancy between PSR and plea agreement does not constitute a claim that the government breached the plea agreement
• affirming a conviction and holding the district court did not violate the rule it must resolve all objec- tions to the PSR because no matter was controverted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).