Irizarry v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice requirement of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(h) is not applicable to variances above advisory Guidelines ranges
• holding that no notice is required for variances
• “‘Departure’ is a term of art under the Guidelines and refers only to non-Guidelines sentences imposed under the framework set out in the Guidelines.”
• \ 'Departure' is a term of art under the Guidelines and refers only to non-Guidelines sentences imposed under the framework set out in the Guidelines.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Irizarry v. United States

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Irizarry v. United States
  First Circuit· 2005-10-21· cited 19×
• Irizarry v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1986-04-25
• Irizarry v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2014-10-06
• Irizarry v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-10-07
• Irizarry v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-12
• Irizarry v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-12