· 12/27/2006
United States v. Mario Joseph Baldrich
Citations
- 471 F.3d 1110
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31818
- 2006 WL 3782951
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Rule 32 requires that “all facts relevant to the defendant’s sentence be provided to the defendant for adversarial testing”
- rejecting challenge that “section 3E1.1(b) is unconstitutional because it penalizes defendants for exercising their constitutional right to go to trial”
- “Rule 32 . . . require[s] the disclosure of all relevant factual information to the defendant.”
- describing the requirements of Rule 32
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Bea, Ikuta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.