Skip to main content
· 12/27/2006

United States v. Mario Joseph Baldrich

Citations

  • 471 F.3d 1110
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31818
  • 2006 WL 3782951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Rule 32 requires that “all facts relevant to the defendant’s sentence be provided to the defendant for adversarial testing”
  • rejecting challenge that “section 3E1.1(b) is unconstitutional because it penalizes defendants for exercising their constitutional right to go to trial”
  • “Rule 32 . . . require[s] the disclosure of all relevant factual information to the defendant.”
  • describing the requirements of Rule 32

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Bea, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.