United States v. Gary A. Newman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for plain error where appellant withdrew his objection in the lower court
• rejecting argument “that dismissal without prejudice renders the Speedy Trial Act meaningless”
• rejecting argument “that dismissal without prejudice renders the Speedy Trial Act meaningless”
• rejecting argument “that dismissal without prejudice renders the Speedy Trial Act meaningless”
• \We review the district court's admission of the evidence for plain error because Newman withdrew his objection and therefore failed to make a contemporaneous objection.\
• “when a second sentencing judge provides an ‘on-the-record, wholly logical, nonvindictive reason for the sentence,’ the requirements of Pearce are met”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).