Ninth Circuit· 3/24/2008

United States v. Carty

Citations

520 F.3d 984
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6084
2008 WL 763770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the district court must explain [the sentence] sufficiently to permit meaningful appellate review”
holding that \the district court must explain [the sentence] sufficiently to permit meaningful appellate review\
holding that an explanation “in some cases may also be inferred from the PSR or the record as a whole”
holding that the district court said enough at sentencing where it indicated it had reviewed the PSR and the sentencing memoranda and heard from the defense’s witnesses and counsel
holding that the district court said enough at sentencing where it indicated it had reviewed the PSR and the sentencing memoranda and heard from the defense's witnesses and counsel
holding that “the district court must explain [the sentence] sufficiently to permit mean- ingful appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Schroeder, Reinhardt, Rymer, Kleinfeld, Thomas, Silverman, McKeown, Wardlaw, Gould, Paez, Berzon, Tallman, Bybee, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

691 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Carty

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.